Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] WikiLeaks
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:58:14 +1000
References: <B1BDEE6C-2CCA-455E-994D-9443729166AC@gmail.com> <t2z36172e5a1004051941zdefd2d54w7bb68cd4347904af@mail.gmail.com> <1E18ABE0-EE67-4F4A-9015-DEDD696BF37B@gmail.com>
 
Off list please Steve if you want to disagree with me. It looks like you
have searched the archives and taken this from a post I made two years ago
about petty local restrictions on photographers in a railway station here.
Since it was my post, I'll snip it for brevity in this response.
It has absolutely nothing to do with anything I expressed in commenting
earlier.

Geoff


On 6 April 2010 16:14, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>
> > In my opinion this is inappropriate for the LUG.
>
> and this...?
>
> Folks, some more pictures and a tale. While waiting to collect my child
> from
> school I walked along a footpath adjacent to a railway station
> photographing
> some clouds over the wire fence surrounding the property. .........
Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)
 In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] WikiLeaks)