Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Most portable 135
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:12:26 +0200
References: <o2ndaaeb97e1004051522p5e158084zd125106c6d0bc1b1@mail.gmail.com> <4BBA68B4.6080706@cox.net> <j2zdaaeb97e1004051554kd0e7158fqc60cd88f15424ac0@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jim,

The Carl Zeiss 135/4 Tele-Tessar is light, small and excellent glass 
(also branded Voigtl?nder Color Dynarex) - I have one in Rollei QBM, but 
I think it was also made in M42 and CY mount - maybe someone else knows.


Here's one: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=13215

Cheers
Douglas


On 06.04.2010 00:54, James Laird wrote:
> Doesn't have to be Leica glass, although I'd prefer that, but I do
> want good performance. I'm planning a trip and need a telephoto for my
> GH1 that doesn't way a ton.
>
> Jim
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Mike Durling<durling at cox.net>  wrote:
>    
>> The 135/4.5 Hektor is not a stellar performer, but probably lighter than 
>> the
>> rest.
>>
>> Mike D
>>
>> James Laird wrote:
>>      
>>> What is the smallest, lightest Leica 135mm?
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>    


Replies: Reply from rhc3vt at hotmail.com (Richard Coutant) ([Leica] Most portable 135)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Most portable 135)
Message from durling at cox.net (Mike Durling) ([Leica] Most portable 135)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] Most portable 135)