Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 250 or 280
From: topoxforddoc at btinternet.com (Charlie Chan)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:00:31 +0100
References: <6661854.1270344810336.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Doug is quite right. The 280/4 APO is significantly better than the older 
280/2.8 non modular APO. Interestingly for those on a budget, the old Tamron 
300/2.8 SP LDIF adaptall 2 lens is not far off the 280/2.8 APO. I had all 3 
for a while (bought the Tamron first, the the 2.8 and finally the 4) and 
there's not much between the Tamron and the older APO - tiny bit more colour 
fringing and that was about it!

Charlie Chan
Cheltenham, UK

topoxforddoc at btinternet.com
www.cancer-surgeon.co.uk
www.charlie-chan.co.uk



On 4 Apr 2010, at 02:33, Doug Herr wrote:

> afirkin at afirkin.com wrote:
> 
>> I thought when I got the 280mm f2.8 I was in heaven, but the newer one
>> sounds even better.
> 
> Yes it is.  I've compared them side-by-side.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] 250 or 280)