[Leica] Micro 4/3rds

[richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)]

I love it, and don't see why anyone would turn it off.

Nathan hates it and doesn't see why anyone would turn it on :-)

And so it goes.

The only camera I would now buy without in body stabilization is a Leica.

Or until next time I want to buy a camera that happens to be perfect except
for lack of in body IS :-)
(which is pretty darn unlikely but I like a CMA)

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> There is -- I've picked up somewhere -- allegedly a downside to having the
> image stablization in the camera, on all the time, whatever. What can the
> downside be? Like why doe sit have an on/off switch on my panasonic 14-=45
> lens?
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:07 PM, A. Lal <alal at poly.edu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Lastly, given the software correction built ino digital cameras how
> well
> > do
> > > Panasonic lenses (e.g. the 20/1.7 pancake) work on Olympus bodies
> > >
> >
> > The Panasonic 20 works great on the Oly EP1, and I've been pretty happy
> > with
> > having the anti-shake in the camera when I put my Leica glass on the
> camera
> > with adapters.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sonny
> > http://www.sonc.com
> > http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> > Natchitoches, Louisiana
> >
> > USA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> blog: <
http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// portfolio: <http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/AnotherCalifornia2>
// mailing lists: <http://www.imagecraft.com/contact.html>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]