Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:40:31 -0400
References: <C7D79F23.605B9%mark@rabinergroup.com> <F5694015-DCA0-473B-87F9-6BCFD434A842@comcast.net> <EC093803-A43D-4A2A-B417-FA0CE8B89F96@frozenlight.eu> <5EC9B628-2079-4ED2-8F22-805C508BCBCE@comcast.net> <697A3A1A2B38456C9AD1C8FBDFB8B777@qck8vqhgou8blu> <781598F2-DC4B-48C2-94EF-2C0FCD16487E@comcast.net> <i2w19b6d42d1003301902kdfd118d3h66e3cc556d439bae@mail.gmail.com> <00ce01cad079$17760070$46620150$@net>

Who's betting? i'm not betting. I just "bet", you know? As in, "I bet the
final health care bill won't have a public option even now that
legislatively they've figured out a way to pull it off...."

My take on costs was entirely based on what I think CV perceives its
marketing model to be: an area of some interest to me. In other words any
interested company with sufficient upfront capital can make a knockoff M9
and sell it for a little less. But CV perceives itself differently. My price
guess was based entirely on my sense of that company's "branding"
philosophy, which would make it highly unusual for them to issue a full
frame digital camera that cost significantly more than any other on the
market and right now that bar is set at $2000 with the Sony A850. the D700
is down to $2400 and the new Canon 5D mark II is $2500.  My belief is -- and
guess what happens if I'm wrong? Nothing! -- that CV wouldn't do a FF
digital camera, rangefinder or no, if they couldn't be very competitive with
those prices.

That's "why I "say this."

If it's not full frame, then I picture them competing price-wise with the
D300.



On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at 
earthlink.net>wrote:

> Why do you say this?
>
> We, the assembled multitude, have NO idea the cost of components for
> cameras.  For all we know, the correct choice of FF sensor may be less cost
> than the 2/3 or 1/2 or whatever sensors we now have.....  If company XYZ
> gets a hair in the wrong place, they will want to take market share, and do
> it by cutting the cost to the camera makers.....
>
> Don't bet on anything WRT costs ......
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i at earthlink.net
>
>
> The other possibility is that wit will not be full frame, which will bring
> down the cost even further.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Further Rumors on *that* New RF)