Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Makes perfect sense to keep the "brand" consistent across all products and services. Just too perfectly and simply obvious Geoff. Yet we do have the w i k i to play with. ;~) Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Mar 15, 2010, at 6:12 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > Surely the LUG logo that is used in the LUG annual books too is > perfect? Ask > Brian? > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > On 16 March 2010 09:03, Spencer Cheng <spencer at aotera.org> wrote: > >> Hi George, >> >> The nice thing about a wiki is that it is a community effort. It's >> what we >> make of it. When we have a logo, we have a logo. If Leica want to >> come and >> beat us up before we have nifty logo, we'll just have to go logo- >> less. Not >> the end of the world. >> >> LUG by most definitions is a community, albeit a very scattered >> one. :) >> >> I'll put you in touch with the gentleman who has volunteered to >> see if he >> is interested in a group effort. >> >> Regards, >> Spencer >> >> On Mar 15, 2010, at 17:51, George Lottermoser wrote: >> >>> I'll volunteer to work up a wiki logo >>> however I'm not sure when I can get to it >>> (which is why I didn't respond to your original request) >>> (I also don't want to get in the way of someone who stepped up >>> already) >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information