Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Possible damage to M9 sensor from flying
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:44:58 -0500
References: <19b6d42d1003121248x5870578cxc1c164044707eca6@mail.gmail.com> <C7C01F5F.5F435%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Man can you ever step on a joke. Although the Darwin follow up is quite
good.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> > In a way some of think every camera IS venerable. Except those disposable
> > ones. Meanwhile I know I'll be careful of venereal diseases on my next
> long
> > flight.... although if the flight is really long I might be tempted to
> take
> > the risk.
>
>
> I flunked English in Grammer school be don't we mean vulnerable?
> Venereal or venerable I think we're in trouble with these V words.
>
> If something was vulnerable it would hard for it to get to be venerable.
> Darwin said that.
>
>
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Possible damage to M9 sensor from flying)
 In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Possible damage to M9 sensor from flying)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Possible damage to M9 sensor from flying)