Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Not enough pennies for the S2? No problem, here comes the Pentax 645D
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:24:29 -0800
References: <eb6799211003091840i28cda4a7g937f77991c23fbaa@mail.gmail.com> <4B97E98E.9090806@whitedogs.co.uk>
A slight link...
More MP and fixed area = smaller pixels = more noise = probably less D/R
But it is a stretch...
You are right, marketing speak.....
Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net
The marketing speak is interesting - "Thanks to approximately 40
effective megapixels, it assures a wide dynamic range" I didn't think
the number of pixels had any impact on dynamic range. Am I right or wrong?
In reply to:
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Not enough pennies for the S2? No problem, here comes the Pentax 645D)
Message from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] Not enough pennies for the S2? No problem, here comes the Pentax 645D)