Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Not enough pennies for the S2? No problem, here comes the Pentax 645D
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:24:29 -0800
References: <eb6799211003091840i28cda4a7g937f77991c23fbaa@mail.gmail.com> <4B97E98E.9090806@whitedogs.co.uk>

A slight link...

More MP and fixed area = smaller pixels = more noise = probably less D/R

But it is a stretch... 

You are right, marketing speak..... 

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net

The marketing speak is interesting - "Thanks to approximately 40 
effective megapixels, it assures a wide dynamic range"  I didn't think 
the number of pixels had any impact on dynamic range.  Am I right or wrong?







In reply to: Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Not enough pennies for the S2? No problem, here comes the Pentax 645D)
Message from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] Not enough pennies for the S2? No problem, here comes the Pentax 645D)