Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
This may be true, but it is not pertinent to why the photo was disqualified. He may indeed not have deserved to win, but that is a very different question. ric On Mar 5, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Chris Saganich wrote: > I think the conversion is important and the lines should be redrawn in the > digital-age, so comparisons with antiquated processes are interesting but > not appropriate. Really what was missing from the image was a good > photographer in the sense that he probably shot 500 haphazard images from > an outsiders perspective not able to get close enough and then tried to > figure out later how to get a good photograph.