Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wow! I had no idea that the S2 was so (relatively) small. When you
think about the sensor size of the S2, even the lens is diddy compared
to the Canon zoom.
Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK
Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2010) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010
Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
(2008)
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> I'm also fond of comparison shots with the S2 against top of the line
>> Canon
>> and Nikon DSLR's. As it is smaller. Though no Barnack.
>> http://www.juzaphoto.com/shared_files/articles/leica_s2/leica_s2_photo1.jpg
>> Hoppys photography is better.
>> Though this Canon is impressively used. And would be brassy if it had any
>> brass. So its magnesiumisy.
>> Maitani the designer of the Pen f and OM2 would be impressed by the Leica
>> S2. As it is in effect a larger format in a smaller camera.
>>
>> [Rabs]
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
> http://www.juzaphoto.com/shared_files/articles/leica_s2/leica_s2_photo1.jpg
>
>
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information