Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]When all of the smoke clears I think you can rest assured that the 35/2 lenses from Leica, Zeiss, and Konica are pretty closely matched. If the members had a 35/2 shootout here with photos posted from all three lenses, I'd hate to be the judge of which picture was shot with which lens. And if it takes a 16x20 to tell the difference, I have to tell you that I've only printed one 16x20 in my whole life and it was shot with a Zeiss (Kyocera) 50/2 Planar lens. It looked just fine and hung in a gallery for a while. Jeffery On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Wendy Thurman wrote: > I'm not necessarily in the lens market; I feel I should stick with the 50 > lux I have as I learn the Leica system. One of these days I'll want/need a > wider lens. While of course a Leica 35 cron is, well, a Leica, I would > appreciate opinions or experiences any of you may have with this lens. > It's > affordably priced and appears to be generally well-regarded. > > Thanks, > > Wendy > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information