Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 44, Issue 80
From: mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope)
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:00:09 +0000
References: <mailman.995.1265131244.73134.lug@leica-users.org> <963CFF6D431342B4B8E9A63A946D09E5@SueHome>

I agree with you - I mean why do yo need two 'Baby' and a 'pet' mode or 
modes for 'soft skin'?




Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK

Homepage               http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog                   http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2010)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010
Picture a week (2009)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
                (2008) 
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008


Sue Pearce wrote:
> 
>> I think the camera was  dipped in Complicatonite. There are scene 
>> modes: 17 of them, plus the
>> usual Program, Aperture priority, Shutter Priority, manual, movie,
>> intelligent auto, two custom modes and one with an artist's pallette,
>> which I have no idea about.  Then there are the flash modes (which I
>> haven't looked at yet).  This little camera is very a la mode!   In
>> short, I think it, like many other cameras of Japanese origin, is too
>> complicated.  Features have been added for three reasons: first because
>> the marketers think it's a good idea, second because the opposition do
>> it and third because they can.
>>
> Would I be considered a fool if I ask if they left out all this 
> foolishness and used the computing power to improve the buffer or 
> something useful?
> 
> Bill Pearce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from bs.pearce at cox.net (Sue Pearce) ([Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 44, Issue 80)