Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2010-01-31-15:38:31 philippe.amard: > I shot these this afternoon; neither interesting nor artistic as such, > but I used two bodies on a same lens, and didn't fiddle much with the > files so I'd like to know your 'perception' of the rendition of either. > > Note that the light had changed ... cloudy background , then sunny, > hence some WB issues, and or colour rendition? > Other? > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2010/2010-PAW-04-Mutz-1310602.jpg.html These are so different because of the lighting change that I'm disinclined even to try to pay attention to the equipment differences. I like the prighter (Olympus?) one because with the similar tones all through the fields around the tree, you get (without post-processing nonsense) an almost-monochomatic, graphic look (though with areas of subtle color like the greyish-blue sky and the not-precisely-black leaves coming out of the snow). In that context, the distracting element which weakens the picture would be the out-of-focus foreground grass. I'd be tempted to see what things look like when you try cropping that out, possibly trying to leave as much as possible of the rock border. Doing so might require that you kill some sky as well, if the balance looks off. But in this case the tree might still work nicely right there in the middle. -J