Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Measuring exposure lag (a long post)
From: lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:00:07 -0500

* Forgive me for jumping into this exposure lag discussion late. I use the
term exposure lag rather than shutter lag. Shutter lag is the elapsed time
between the button press and the click of the shutter. Shutter lag is
basically a function of the design and complexity of the camera. It is
relatively constant depending on the mechanical and electrical activities
that must take place before an exposure is made. Exposure lag includes the
human reaction time between deciding to take the picture and the physical
act of pressing the shutter. It is often the longest and most variable
element of exposure lag.*

* Human reaction time has been studied for over 200 years and was one of the
first quantitative research areas in cognitive science. Simple reaction time
is the time required for an individual to respond to the presence of a
stimulus, i.e. to press a button as soon as an event occurs. Snapping the
shutter when a batter swings at a baseball is a perfect example. The mean
human simple reaction time, as measured in thousands of experiments, is
approximately 180 to 200 milliseconds for a visual stimulus and 140 to 160
milliseconds for an auditory stimulus. The slightly longer time for vision
is due to the more elaborate processing of visual information in the brain.
The photographer is likely to snap the picture quicker if he listens for the
sound of the bat hitting the ball rather than the sight of the bat hitting
the ball. *

* In either case the exposure lag, mechanical plus human reaction time,
means that the ball will be long gone before the picture is taken. To get a
picture of the batter actually hitting the ball, the photographer must
decide to take the picture when the ball is halfway from the pitcher's mound
to home plate. The actual picture of the batter hitting or missing then
becomes a matter of luck. I apologize to the non-USA Lug members for this
use of baseball examples. Substitute whatever sport you wish.*

* Incidentally researchers have reported modest but statistically
significant correlations between reaction time and intelligence. Although
there are numerous exceptions, there is an overall tendency for individuals
with a higher IQ to be slightly faster on reaction time tests. So Luggers
should be the fastest of all, especially when using Leicas.*

* There is a very simple non-instrumental way of measuring the time between
a photographer's decision to take a picture and the camera's recording the
image. Here is how to do it.*

*1. Put a mark on a wall at about eye level. A piece of black tape works
well.*

*2. Have an assistant hold a yardstick or meter stick against the wall with
the bottom level with the mark.*

*3. Focus your camera with flash attached at the mark. It is best if the
camera is on a tripod but it is not really necessary.*

*4. Have the assistant let go of the yardstick and let it drop. It is very
important that the assistant not tell you when he is going to drop it.*

*5. As soon as you see the stick start to fall, press the shutter button and
take a flash picture.*

*6. On the viewing screen, note the number of inches or centimeters that the
stick has fallen past the mark. Repeat a few times. Electrons are cheap.*

* Now comes the difficult part. Using the equation for a freely falling body
in earth's gravity, calculate the time elapsed for the yardstick to fall the
indicated number of inches or centimeters. The equation is:*

*Distance = 1/2 g x t^2*

*The acceleration due to gravity in centimeters is 981 cm/sec. In inches it
is 386.4 in/sec. Rewriting and simplifying the equations and solving for
time, the equations are:*

*for centimeters:  Time = sq. rt. (D/490)*

*for inches:  Time = sq. rt. (D/193)*

* Don't scoff at this method of measuring short times. It was used for
decades in laboratories before reliable electronic instrumentation became
available. With a yardstick or meter stick it works well for times shorter
than half a second. Longer times let the stick fall too far. A one second
interval would let the stick fall 16 feet. It might be better to drop a ball
off the side of a wall. Or the Tower of Pisa.*

* Here are some sample distances and times.*

*Centimeters:  .1 sec = 4.91 cm: .2 sec = 19.62 cm: .3 sec = 44.15 cm: .4
sec = 78.48 cm: .5 sec = 122.63 cm (beyond the length of a meter stick).
Inches:  .1 sec = 1.93 in: .2 sec = 7.73 in: .3 sec = 17.39 in: .4 sec =
30.91 in: .5 sec = 48.30 in (beyond the length of a yard stick).*

* I cheated when I timed the exposure lag of my Oly E-500 several years ago.
I simply photographed the face of a 1/100 second electric timer. An
assistant started the timer. When I saw the hand start to move, I clicked
the shutter. The exposure lag (reaction time plus shutter lag) varied
between .35 and .45 seconds. Certainly not instantaneous. In this time a
baseball thrown by a mediocre pitcher would have traveled about 3/4 of the
distance from the pitcher's mound to home plate. Three examples of this
measurement of exposure lag are:*

*
*

**
*

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/Timer_+flash.jpg.html


http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/Timer_+bright+room+light.jpg.html


http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Larry+Z/Timer_+ambient+room+light.jpg.html
*

*
*

* Incidentally the camera I own with the shortest exposure lag is a Rollei
35S. Even faster than a Leica M3.*

**

*Larry Z*
*
*


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Measuring exposure lag (a long post))
Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] Measuring exposure lag (a long post))