Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica m10 under attack
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:58:14 -0800
References: <13011871.1488471264649808585.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12>

On Jan 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:

> And this is important because?  Its only 8 hundreths of a second, who 
> really cares?

and please, why in the world is the Subject...leica M10 under attack...    ?

this ranks high on the scale of cerebral auto-eroticism.


Steve



> 
> Gene
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marty Deveney" <benedenia at gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 8:04:31 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [Leica] leica m10 under attack
> 
> The shutter lag of a Leica M3 is 0.016 s (it is the same for the other
> mechanical Leica Ms), the M7 is 0.012 s and a Nikon D3 is about 0.041
> s.  I've seen various times advertised for the M8/M9 but I
> consistently timed my M8s and one of the M9s I trialled at ~0.08 s.
> it's six times the mechanical Ms and twice the D3.
> 
> Marty
> 
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
> gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can any other M9 owners comment on this mentioned shutter lag or is there 
>> a
>> technical source to quantify this?
>> I have no means of measuring anything and can only comment that I have 
>> never
>> noticed any discernible lag at all with my M9 nor my M8.
>> A couple of people elsewhere have mentioned this but there has been some
>> confusion whether they were referring to travel/feel of the shutter 
>> release
>> action, or writing speed to buffer perhaps.
>> Knowing Marty I am sure that he has meant shutter lag precisely .
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Geoff
>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>> 
>> 
>> On 28 January 2010 10:18, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> If such a thing existed I'd already have one and maybe two,
>>> particularly if Leica also decreased the shutter lag.
>>> 
>>> I've used a back for a photomicroscope based on a monochrome sensor
>>> for B&W output that was enough to convince me that the dynamic range
>>> alone would be enough to convince me.
>>> 
>>> Marty
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
>>> archiphoto.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> From what I've seen of the Kodak 760, I would go for a B&W M9/10. You'd
>>> gain
>>>> about 2 stops of sensitivity, 2 stops of dynamic range and also a
>>> noticeable
>>>> increase in resolution.
>>>> 
>>>> I haven't got an M9, but I would go for a B&W M9 before a colour M9.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> At 8:37 AM +0100 1/27/10, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> He is suggesting what would likely be a 7000 Euro camera that cannot
>>> even
>>>>> take a color picture ?!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Good thing he is not in a position of power at Leica, the company would
>>>>> have been bankrupt by now...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nathan
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 27, 2010, at 8:21 AM, mehrdad wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>  http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/hogan-leica.shtml
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  the second article to appear @ luminous that is trying to shape a new
>>>>>> lecia
>>>>>>  m10
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>>>>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>>>>  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>>>>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>>>  >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] leica m10 under attack)