Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:29:47 -0600
References: <mailman.277.1263276672.73134.lug@leica-users.org> <4B4CA188.9050701@verizon.net> <656DDC9C-2082-464B-8324-E19290A72B69@embarqmail.com> <B3926580-B589-42B1-AF1F-4E26B784EF85@frozenlight.eu> <cee56221001120952p4e6fc052q343a7fe0c2667f74@mail.gmail.com>
I only shot one frame with the lens, it was Jeffery Smith's, and it was on a
film camera, I have no idea what film it was, but I really like the
outcome. I have toyed with trying ot out again sometime on my M8, because I
think it would make a nice match. I thought the lens was kinda heavy and
big for a 35, but the proof is in the pudding; Anyhow, here is the shot.
http://www.sonc.com/jeff_and_kid.htm
--
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
(+31.754164,-093.099080)
USA
Replies:
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
In reply to:
Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)
Message from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment. NOW 35/1.2 also.)