Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment?
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:11:46 -0700
References: <mailman.204.1263116120.73134.lug@leica-users.org>, <4B4A18CB.1050206@verizon.net>, <2540C1FB2A404BDC9483DD41D25E5BF3@syneticfeba505>

Agree completely with Ted.

 

Greg Lorenzo

Calgary, Canada
 
> From: tedgrant at shaw.ca
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:49:44 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment?
> 
> Stan Yoder asked:
> Subject: [Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment?
> 
> 
> > Anyone care to comment on this lens? Tom A likes it. Erwin seems not to
> > have evaluated it. Would appreciate hearing of users' experiences.<<<<
> 
> Hi Stan,
> Given what Tom Abrahamsson puts lenses through during his "real life test" 
> methods of shooting hundreds and hundreds of frames under all kinds of 
> conditions, if he likes it? I wouldn't waste my time asking for any other 
> opinions! WHY?
> 
> Quite simple really, Tom A. is the best of the best for assessment on any 
> M 
> type lens.
> cheers,
> ted 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/


In reply to: Message from s.yoder at verizon.net (Stan Yoder) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] C/V 50/1.1 comment?)