Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Yearbook 2009 - How is the Printing?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:37:29 -0800
References: <18806505.1262966577463.JavaMail.root@wamui-hunyo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

On Jan 8, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Wayne Serrano wrote:

> I am now a bit concerned about how my images looked printed.  Should have 
> my copy next week.


your two wonderful images look fine to my eye,

Steve


> 
> Wayne
> 
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de>
>> Sent: Jan 8, 2010 10:59 AM
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG Yearbook 2009 - How is the Printing?
>> 
>> 
>> Alan,
>> 
>> it seems to depend on the input data.
>> 
>> Some of the shots - where the balance between black and white is almost 
>> 1:1 - are printed perfectly - like Jayanands tiger (page 40).
>> 
>> My BW shot with a predominance of white and grey (page 39) appears quite 
>> a bit darker than I expected (about 1.5 stops).
>> 
>> A very few BW shots unfortunately look as if something went wrong in the 
>> printing process. (Marty Deveney's African shots (pp 122-123) and 
>> Nicolas Vigier's landscapes pp 194-195)
>> 
>> Maybe some kind of automatic gain correction (Auto-level) is being 
>> applied.
>> 
>> Was this the problem you had?
>> 
>> Perhaps this varies depending on the facility where it was printed - it 
>> would be interesting to find out - my copy was printed in Holland.
>> 
>> 
>> The blacks in my copy are really rich, saturated and very black.
>> 
>> Colour reproduction is very good throughout the book.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Douglas
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Are the B&W pictures neutral?  I ordered a free Blurb book on Dec. 28th 
>>> as per their offer to make up for
>>> bad printing on some from last year (like mine).  I wanted to have a 
>>> second copy of "12 Leica Users", so
>>> this week, when it arrived, I compared it to the one printed in 2008 - 
>>> the new one is purple in the blacks, not black!
>>> 
>>> Last year it took them three tries to get me a good printing of  "19 
>>> Leica Users".
>>> 
>>> I'm losing confidence in this company.
>>> 
>>> Alan
>>> 
>>> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
>>> UPAA POY 1978
>>> University Information Technology Services
>>> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from wayneserrano at earthlink.net (Wayne Serrano) ([Leica] LUG Yearbook 2009 - How is the Printing?)