Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] louvre bans photography
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:16:33 +0530
References: <9F07836ED74F1C42AA69DFBAF8A1E2F137850B2528@MBX1.asc.local>

Actually, the painting right opposite the Mona Lisa, Paulo Veronese's
'Marriage at Cana' (where Jesus is said to have turned water into
wine) is IMHO far more rewarding viewing - it is just spectacular!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu> 
wrote:
> I was looking for an academic paper I seem to have read before about the 
> Louvre, copyright, their reproductions, and the original Mona Lisa, and 
> came across this interesting article about the banning of photography:
>
> http://www.culturekiosque.com/art/news/davincicode_pictures_monalisa.html
>
> seems photographing the mona lisa has been verbotten since 1996 but 
> according to the article, the ban only reduced the number of photos taken 
> of the iconic painting by 80%. Security staff are so overwhelmed by the 
> number of people violating the ban they can only stop a handful.
>
> The average time spent viewing DiVinci's masterpiece? fifteen seconds.
>
> kc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] louvre bans photography)