Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Captions
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:35:18 -0800
References: <C75E6631.5B134%mark@rabinergroup.com> <942E089F-7743-44D4-A974-AC99D528BCC7@gmail.com> <BA9C45E150E04B41A0E6105B570CD684@Family>

Douglas Barry offered in answer to Steve Barbour :
Subject: [Leica] Captions


>> Strongly disagree. A caption can add to a picture as well as giving the 
>> who,
> what, where.... How the blazes can one "Untitled" picture be remembered
> against the visual sea of other "Untitled" pictures.

Douglas mon ami, then sorry mate I must disagree with you .

When the Canadian News Photographers Association are judging for our 
National Picture Award competition, captions are not given as the images 
come up. WHY? Well we are looking at the impact of the photo, it's 
considered strength of content as the stand alone photograph.

Yes if we as judges want more information because the image creates 
questions, the caption is shown along side the photo for more information. 
Does the caption add to? Or detract? We have on occasion had a picture as 
seen with caption dropped! WHY? Because the caption is meaningless and 
destroys the image for what it is supposed to represent as a news 
photograph.

The caption, if badly written can change the complete meaning of the stand 
alone photograph. Or a so so image is enhanced due to a well written 
caption. But first and foremost a picture should grab and hold the viewer 
first.... then read the caption.

Many photos do not require a caption simply because the "WOW" factor is so 
strong the viewer is blown away. Then we have the curious viewer who wants 
to know more about the picture. Which would have little impact on the "WOW" 
factor other than cursory information of who why and how.

Actually we have had major arguments due to a caption misrepresenting what 
is happening in the photograph which usually takes the picture out of the 
running as a potential winner. Yet had it selected through 2 editing cuts to 
the final round as a possible winner. But thrown out because of a caption 
misrepresentation. :-(

Captions are not the be all to die for on many photographs. By the same 
token a descriptive well written caption makes the photo content more 
meaningful..... at times.
cheers,
ted


> "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote in response to MR's
>>> Cute captions are death to a serious image.
>>> You want them as bland as possible.
>>> Simply descriptive. Or none.
>>
>> good point Mark...seems if the image works, nothing more need be said...
>>
>> if it needs to be said, it's cus the image has failed,
>>
>
>
> I like captions, but doctors differ and patients die :-)
>
> Douglas
> _________
> Douglas Barry
> Bray, Co. Wicklow
> Republic of Ireland
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.431 / Virus Database: 270.14.122/2590 - Release Date: 12/28/09 
07:16:00



Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Captions)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Week 50 Paris mon amour)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Week 50 Paris mon amour)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Captions)