Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, I thought we were talking about slow-cooked vs. quick-cooked oats.... well, never mind. :-) Dick On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:02 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> Hmmmm.... let's go to the data bank: >> >> For an half cup of oats,* >> Quaker Old Fashioned Oats: 150 calories >> Quick Quaker Oats: 150 calories >> Steel Cut Oatmeal: 150 calories >> Rolled Oats: 150 calories >> >> Fast food in general tends to be fattening because of the large >> percentage of, >> well, fat (and sugar) in it but I've never heard that healthy food cooked >> more >> slowly releases sugars more slowly. I don't think it matters, anyway. >> Seems >> to violate the rule of conservation of energy. You know, a calorie is a >> calorie is a calorie. Maybe it preserves something else, maybe it retains >> more of it's original nutrients? >> >> You're right about chubbies being full of dieting information. What >> would you >> like to know? ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >> Dick > > > I thought we were talking about the stuff we put on it. > If you like rolled oats bobs redmill has rolled you name it! > Rolled Wheat Flakes > Rolled Triticale Flakes > Rolled Spelt Flakes > Rolled Rye Flakes > Rolled Triticale Flakes > > They also have Organic Scottish Oatmeal. > > http://www.bobsredmill.com > > (I don't know them so I don't get anything out of the plug) > > > > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information