Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film & digital
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:10:06 +0100
References: <088CC2B3-F7C3-4C99-AD81-0550DE7DA14F@gmail.com>

Hi Lluis,

I like the second best. But that's because it has less DOF.
Very hard to make a decision when the lenses are different.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema

Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
>  From last Summer, same situation, 2 cameras, 2 different lenses, film 
> and pixels...
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/L1008100BW.jpg.html
> M8, probably with Tri Elmar
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/2009060230.jpg.html
> M3, Zeiss Sonnar Opton, Ilford 50 ISO
> 
> What do you think?....
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
> Blog:
> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
> 
> http://www.lrmusic.es
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)