[Leica] Noctilux - 0.95 vs. 1.0

[grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)]

Not having a Nocti, of any flavor, I would settle for a copy of either, If I 
could afford the entry fee. 


Gene -------------- Original message from Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>: --------------


> > Vick Ko wrote:
> >> Hmmm.  From reading the blog, the f1 is "good enough".  I don't see
> >> much motivating trading up to the f0.95.
> >> Better to get an M9.
> >> 
> >> Vick
> > And I disagreed with most of his conclusions based on the photos shown!
> > The 1.0 results looked better than the .95 in all of them, to me.  I'm
> > perfectly happy sticking with my 1.0.
> > 
> > Tina
> > 
> > 
> I'm fine with my measly f1 I don't need no stinking f .95.
> If I had a spare ten grand I think I might spend it on something else.
> 
> I'd have gone with an f1  or f 1.1  or  f 1.2 lens with use of Aspherics to
> make it much more compact than the current f1 Noctilux.
> More like the f 1.2  Noctilux. Which was like a Summilux on a small amount
> of steroids.
> 
> A job for Cosina and or Zeiss perhaps.
> F 1.2 and  be there.
> In a non heat seeking missile size.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information