Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lightroom or CS4 Bridge?
From: jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore)
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:23:59 -0500
References: <8c8849060912061035m6c4ecc42y327a71627ff33daf@mail.gmail.com> <C74172AC.59D94%mark@rabinergroup.com>

2009-12-06-14:39:40 Mark Rabiner:
> But Lightroom is great became people who've always felt intimidated by
> Photoshop can just skip Photoshop. And tweak their images in that half 
> baked
> way.

Ignorance. Ignorance repeated loudly and over and over doesn't become
truth.

Lightroom is great because it was actually designed to be used by
photographers for photography.  It's good with that.  Photography.
As anyone who's actually used if for awhile for, you know, photography,
comes to realize.

Photoshop is a Swiss Army Chainsaw of a program (I swiped that from a
description of emacs) which can be used to do pretty much anything,
including photography.  It's remarkable that way.  But that doesn't
mean that it's the best tool for this particular job. It's great to
have there on your disk for the one percent or less of photos which
need something out-of-the-ordinary done to them.  Then you pull the
starter rope on the chainsaw and put up with the awkward weight of it
in your hand for that job, then shut it back off and breathe a sigh
f relief and get back to the more-natural tool for the other
ninety-nine and a half percent.

 -Jeff


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Lightroom or CS4 Bridge?)
In reply to: Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Lightroom or CS4 Bridge?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Lightroom or CS4 Bridge?)