Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0
From: durling at cox.net (Mike Durling)
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:19:50 -0500
References: <348513.98692.qm@web82103.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <003601ca7601$59c1d300$0d457900$@net> <BLU0-SMTP47AA61E1192E61F4AC7A308C910@phx.gbl> <4B1B2EF9.4060508@panix.com>

Kubrick had an F-0.7  http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/ac/len/page1.htm

Mike D

Rei Shinozuka wrote:
> given that the 1.0 noct dates back 33 years to our bicentennial, and 
> given that the 1.0 can achieve its speed without the help of aspheric 
> surfaces, the next great breakthrough to get my attention will be an 
> f0.71 lens,  a full stop faster than the 1.0.  might be a while.
>
> -rei
>
>
> Vick Ko wrote:
>> Hmmm.  From reading the blog, the f1 is "good enough".  I don't see 
>> much motivating trading up to the f0.95.
>> Better to get an M9.
>>
>> Vick
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Noctiux - 0.95 vs 1.0)