Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]He seemed like he was trying a little bit too hard to convince himself of the camera's merits. I did find his compare and contrast, between the M8(2) and the M9, to bolster the latter's merits as somewhat uninspired. I'm also not surprised that it could barely keep up with the Canon and the Nikon. Both Canon and Nikon have over a 10 year edge in development. Though both were also beneficiaries of Kodak's research early on. The indifferent manner of testing, which I see also in Erwin Puts' tests, lives me cold. Even pixel peeping requires a bit more proficiency in generating an image. The "test" does not really tell much of the camera's real world capabilities. But maybe in better hands, we might of seen something different. S.d. On Nov 8, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2009, at 8:10 PM, slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > >> Far from from convincing! > > > of what Slobodan? > > Steve > > >> S.d. >> >> >> On Nov 8, 2009, at 7:12 PM, leo wesson wrote: >> >>> http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0911/camera-corner-the-leica-m9.html >>> >>> Good review, David. >>> >>> >>> Leo Wesson >>> Photographer/Videographer >>> 817.733.9157 >>> www.leowesson.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information