Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I absolutely loved Technical Pan at 25. That was a fantastic film. On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Clive Moss <clive.moss at gmail.com> wrote: > Kodachrome at 10 ASA. Who needed more? At 25, the world started going > to hell in a handbasket. 50 ASA - BAH, HUMBUG! Who needs it? > -- > Clive > Blog: http://clive.moss.net/blog > Photographs: http://clive.smugmug.com > Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/clive.moss > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:19 AM, <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote: > > > > > > Why do we need iso 100,000? I seem to remember we all got along just > fine with iso 400 or 800. Seems like just a race to see who can supply the > highest iso before the next guy. > > > > > > Gene > > > > -------------- Original message from mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com>: > -------------- > > > > > >> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess when > m12 is > >> out leica will catch up with todays canon > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, simon jessurun wrote: > >> > >> > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0910/09102001canon1d4.aspbest,simon > >> > amsterdam > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Leica Users Group. > >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------- > >> regards, mehrdad > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >