Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:03:50 +0200
References: <23a0a61f0910211727j22c205e6k6594e6382ca9c0d6@mail.gmail.com> <440b792d0910211759v42bbb4deh802feadf3d60ef93@mail.gmail.com> <4ADFAF3C.6090202@comporium.net>

I want both, Tina. And the fact that Leica did not improve on this  
particular aspect of performance when launching the M9 is a major  
disappointment to me.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Oct 22, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Tina Manley wrote:

> mehrdad wrote:
>> i know with the m8 & m9 we are struggling with iso 1250, i guess  
>> when m12 is
>> out leica will catch up with todays canon
>>
>>
> But we don't need 1250 with our fast Leica lenses.  Would you rather  
> have 1250 iso and crappy lenses or 160 iso and fantastic lenses?   
> I'd rather have the fantastic fast lenses.
>
> Tina
> www.tinamanley.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
In reply to: Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)