Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital vs. film
From: pearceww at rmi.net (Warren Pearce)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:37:47 -0600
References: <E1MxT10-0001W6-Ew@elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <C6F92163.565DE%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Yep

I still have an antique friend that shoots an 8X10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


At 04:09 PM 10/12/2009, you wrote:
> > My 5X7 Deardorff doesn't have any needles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > Happiness is a large negative!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>Its my impression that a 5x7 film you can put on a fairly low end flatbed
>and make a real good file to make an image and or print that would blow away
>small format digital cameras costing tens of thousands.
>
>Digital contact prints rule!
>:)
>
>http://rabinergroup.com/Images/Pigman.jpg
>
>
>Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Linda & Warren Pearce
Colorado Springs  




In reply to: Message from pearceww at rmi.net (Warren Pearce) ([Leica] digital vs film)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] digital vs. film)