Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, it the saloonkeeper had taken the extremist, Leica-only line, then I would have had to leave the list in 2004. And who knows if I would have bought the M8 in Dec. 2008 then. So I am quite pleased that Brian and Jim keep a wide open church here. I shoot 99% with the M8 now, but I am solidly in camp #1. Nathan (never mind the gear, just look at the pictures) Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Oct 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > Two approaches: > 1) The photograph takes precedence over the equipment. > 2) LUG based on love (or at least appreciation) of Leica > > I tend to agree with you. > > At the same time I understand Jim and Brian's open hearts > and appreciation of the photograph as most important; > irrespective of equipment. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Scott Gregory wrote: > >> I've always wondered why the LUG does not use only Leica >> Photographs for their yearly book. After all, it is Leica interest >> that brings the group together, I thought. NOT in any way to >> diminish the fine efforts of Jim Shulman, but just asking?? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Scott >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information