Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 4:30 PM +0100 9/24/09, Neil Beddoe wrote: >Somebody asked me once whether anyone would print black and white if >colour photography had been invented first. I don't know but I >think it would be a lot less common. > Exactly. B&W in general (and this is a generalization) relates to nostalgia and what we liked in older photographs and the fact that until quite recently B&W photography was much cheaper, much easier and more archival. Just think of the photos we would prefer if photography when first invented would have been able to produce excellent chroma but uneven or even lacking luminance information. I realize this is somewhat far fetched, but our preference, especially among older practitioners to prefer our initial step further into abstraction (all photography already being an abstraction) to remove colour information from phots is almost certainly due to the historical technical development. Looking at painting/drawing, we see that B&W has been a parallel development often due to certain materials, but abstractions have taken all sorts of forms; again, due to technology/technique certain types of abstractions have received more attention than others but in general B&W has not been a major path like it has in photography. All that, and I realize my traditional, home darkroom printing side can relate to the B&W picture better, but the colour pallette in particular is such that in the end I think the colour picture is the better one. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com