Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, Actually, I've been meaning to look into a PC 35mm lens. Until somewhat recently, most all of my photography was with LF (8x10 or 4x5) field cameras. All the lines were straight, but it was pretty liberating when I discovered 35mm, then digital 35mm. I have done a little 35mm "architectural" photography for publication, where everything had to be just so. It was pretty easy with levels and a tripod, but most of the time I don't carry a tripod around. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of George > Lottermoser > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 12:12 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] IMGS: Another Church In New Mexico > > interesting discussion > around the various "approaches" in photography. > > I, like Ted, believe "architecture" should be photographed > with a level on the camera whenever possible > and preferably with the use of PC rise, fall, shift; > all of which preserve the integrity of the building. > > at the same time > I have no problem with artistic license and wild interpretations > if > they work to help me understand the building > or > in some way go beyond it to say something else. > I feel the same way about many wide angle distortions > even beyond architecture. > > True camera level perspective control > is quite difficult with digital cameras and backs; > requiring expensive wide angle lenses and PC devices. > > Photoshop "works" > yet not quite in the same way > that a plumb camera does. > > One way to tackle NM churches or Gaudi buildings > is to shoot a reference photo with a level camera > and use it to compare with your photoshop corrections. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Sep 13, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Ken Carney wrote: > > > in the case of the NM churches, a question would be: what would > > you correct it to? I don't think I've ever seen one with a > > straight line > > anywhere. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information