Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Tri-Elmar?
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:10:40 +0200
References: <D481850C-BA88-4064-AA99-5CDBA5C89189@embarqmail.com>
 
You're absolutely right. it is a very convenient lens if you don't need 
high speed.


Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema

Ric Carter wrote:
> Okay.
> 
> I've been noticing that most of the work I do in the street, I'm 
> shooting f/4 to 8.
> 
> My predominant shooting on film was on 35 and 50. That's 28 and 35 on 
> the M8.
> 
> That makes a Tri-Elmar 28-35-50 look like a pretty ideal lens--most 
> daily use plus a short portrait lens at 50.
> 
> Am I wrong?
> 
> ric
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.63/2317 - Release Date: 08/21/09 
> 06:04:00
>
In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Tri-Elmar?)