Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Tri-Elmar?
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 07:03:13 +0000 (GMT)
References: <D481850C-BA88-4064-AA99-5CDBA5C89189@embarqmail.com>

For outdoor use I am a fan.
Frank



----- Original Message ----
From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>; leica at freelists.org
Sent: Saturday, 22 August, 2009 5:14:33 AM
Subject: [Leica] Tri-Elmar?

Okay.

I've been noticing that most of the work I do in the street, I'm shooting 
f/4 to 8.

My predominant shooting on film was on 35 and 50. That's 28 and 35 on the M8.

That makes a Tri-Elmar 28-35-50 look like a pretty ideal lens--most daily 
use plus a short portrait lens at 50.

Am I wrong?

ric

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Tri-Elmar?)