Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:35:38 -0500
References: <380-22009841321365230@M2W021.mail2web.com> <FC26A6A1-DC15-40B0-A44D-0C6813D2F929@mac.com> <7ac27f4f0908131516t1889edf7we0b0b44e50111890@mail.gmail.com>

Richard, I believe that your point is that each system,
whether Oly, Nikon, Canon, Hasselblad, PhaseOne, Leica, et al
and either digital and/or film
can produce rich, stunning photography;
when both gear and photographer are pleased with one another.

Couldn't agree more.
In the end - show me the print - I don't give a hoot about the gear.
Even a 72 ppi .jpg can show a whole lot of aesthetic quality
(though not compared to a fine print).
So much for the subjective and aesthetic side of the craft.

Then we have technical realities like;
bit depth, dynamic range, micro fine detail rendering,
color fringing, chromatic aberration, moire, etc.
We can look at these technical realities in the form of charts,  
graphs, lists, etc.
and/or do side by side real world comparisons
of files on the screen as well as prints.
However - we can never glean much useful technical data
from a 72 ppi .jpg.
In technical comparisons I want to see a
RAW file, full resolution .tif or 16x20 print
to make a technical judgement.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Aug 13, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> Canon is my favorite brand to beat on :-) I dislike its colors.Yes,
> that's subjective.
>
> Nikon, now I have a soft heart for.
>
> That's this guy that talks all days about how the clinical sharp
> Japanese medium format lens :cut your eyes: if you look at the photos
> for too long. So it goes...
>
> Heck, look at the James Delano's essay on Burn that was posted a
> couple weeks ago. The comment section makes funny reading.
> -- 
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
> http://rfman.wordpress.com
> // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)