Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:41:18 -0700
References: <380-22009841321365230@M2W021.mail2web.com>

Michael Johnston wrote a blog on that one, I just stole it.

OK, I will remove Nathan and Frank from that list too. Aside from
Nathan, Frank, and Tina, most people make claims...

But you know, Leica M8 is sharper than E-3 pics are personal opinions too :-)

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM,
wildlightphoto at earthlink.net<wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Richard Man wrote:
>
>>>>
> Most people make claims (I will leave Tina out of this one :-) )
> because they want to justify their expense.
> <<<
>
> If you haven't conducted research into this question, saying "Most
> people..." is pure speculation and can easily be used as rationalization
> for a personal opinion. ?I don't think we know why most people make the
> claims they do.
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)