Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:00:21 -0400
References: <C6A888C2.52C32%mark@rabinergroup.com> <96FF42E3-35B3-4711-AF85-17EFD909B5AB@mac.com> <p06230901c6a90b407b71@[10.0.1.199]> <9C79D453-5D12-4581-962F-A8BF85C099E6@mac.com> <90B6363E-8AC8-459D-AEE7-FD437B166383@charter.net> <D629A524-FCE2-4133-AFEC-74A514A6B489@mac.com> <652063.25084.qm@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <99DA609C-100C-4C6E-9BA5-1BFF88275812@charter.net> <385667.22366.qm@web111818.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

love the one you're with

ric


On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Philip Price wrote:

> Intellectually I can accept the digital arguement, emotionally I  
> still love film



Replies: Reply from philipprice80 at yahoo.com (Philip Price) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from philipprice80 at yahoo.com (Philip Price) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)