Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:52:04 -0500
References: <C6A755DE.52B65%mark@rabinergroup.com> <9A4C83C9-1D7C-40C3-9184-C466ABE0A869@mac.com>
 
I've yet to see that question pop up in any wedding magazine, and those 
magazines have really whacked photography questions. Some wedding magazines 
still tell the bride to make sure they get the negatives from the 
photographer. Just a few years behind in some cases.

That .0001% knowing 24x36, being Tina of course. :)

Chris




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive 
than M8?


> I would venture a guess
> that .0001 % of bride's mothers
> would know a 24 x 36 sensor camera
> from a micro 4/3rds.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
Replies: Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)