Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:07:42 -0400
 
> <http://peakaction.wordpress.com/2006/11/03/the-leica-m8-and-the-
> working-photographer/>
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
Would the date though be 2006/11/03?
I think that's it.
The perception of what format we need to be working now in has gotten
crystallized or focused this year. 2009
The Brides mother in law wants 24x36.

Mark William Rabiner
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)