Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:22:10 -0500
References: <C6A755DE.52B65%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
The bride's mother
The publication picture editor
The stock agency
The commercial client
The portrait client
all
want the best possible images
at the best possible price

which may be provided by any number of formats
both below or above 24 x 36

I would venture a guess
that .0001 % of bride's mothers
would know a 24 x 36 sensor camera
from a micro 4/3rds.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> The Brides mother in law wants 24x36.
Replies: Reply from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)