Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:46:08 +0200
References: <72B29F90-8891-45B7-BB22-E1A364EE952F@gmail.com> <C6A634CC.1652%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk>
 
Nice article thx1,simon

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Steve Unsworth <lug op 
steveunsworth.co.uk>wrote:

> I have no idea.
>
> There's an interesting article about the physical limitations of sensors
> here...
>
> <
> http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/guest/physical_limits.html
> >
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 10/8/09 19:08, "Leo Wesson" <leowesson op gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Would that infer that the high iso noise levels would be the same as
> the 8?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)