Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:08:57 -0500
References: <C6A5EF2E.1621%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <2A1EF42A-81D3-4B79-A33B-40166BB45422@iisaka.com>

Would that infer that the high iso noise levels would be the same as  
the 8?

Leo Wesson
photographer?videographer
leo at leowesson.com
817?733?9157

On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.com> wrote:

> 18 megapixels... full frame...
>
> Sounds like the size of the pixels on the sensor is the same as M8.
>
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Steve Unsworth wrote:
>
>> I don't know if it's been mentioned here, but there's a French  
>> dealer with a
>> price for the M9...
>>
>> <http://www.objectif-boetie.fr/neuf.htm>
>>
>> 500 Euros more expensive than an M8.2.
>>
>> Sorry is this has been sent twice, but I don't sem to have received  
>> the
>> first copy.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)