Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phil, Your message is excruciating to read. Jerry Philip F wrote: > Let me preface this with the statement that I'm not trying to be hurtful > at all. Just posing some questions to the list about "proper" "street > photography" and were we all draw the line between art, documentation and > objectification. > > I've mentioned this before on the LUG with it only to be swept aside > quickly but didn't have my questions answered then and still I'm not > having my questions answered now. so at the risk of castigating myself > among this community I pose the question: "If were to take a photo of a > woman's bottom with my Leica is it street photography?" Further: "If I > were to ask that woman before I took the photo if i could do so, would she > allow me?" Further still: "If I took the photo with my nearly silent > digital rangefinder THEN told her and showed her the photo, would she > approve or would I get slapped/arrested/have my camera confiscated or > destroyed?" > Yes, i am aware that I'm asking questions of morality based upon my own > beliefs and as much as I don't want to impress them upon anyone else, i > strongly believe that photographers all over the world have a duty to be > respectful in their work and respectful towards other people. I may be > guilty of this in some very few instances but I also don't want to be > complicit in this behavior and further validate it. The taking of photos > in this manner actually does harm to the rights of photographers around > the world. Making the case that this is not a social more or convention in > other countries only serves to prove that objectification in those places > is the norm and is acceptable. > As English is the language of the LUG, the very nature of calling them > "senoritas" takes away from them being women. it makes them "other" and as > such more acceptable to objectify. It is a long established tactic of > distancing the subject of conversation to create an other and feeds > sexism, racism and all those other traits which we claim to be making our > way past in the 21st century. It's a way to make her not a woman but an > acceptable object. If there were more women on the LUG would we see as > much of this? Would it be as accepted? If the language of the LUG were > Spanish would it be as accepted? > Its objectification is what it is. Sorry, but the few years I've been here > on the the LUG I've seen my fair share of very non-interactive photos from > afar with the celebrated 85mm Sonnar or 90mm whatnot. Who are we kidding > when talking about the "low contrast" or bokeh or whatever smokescreen we > all put up to allow ourselves to gaze without guilt or shame on a blatant > photo of a woman's ass? I don't want to be pushing my morals on people but > this is not photojournalism or street photography or whatever you want to > call it. Its borderline lecherous subversive image capture is what it is. > All the talk of subtle tones and resolution and all that jazz are just up > there to make us feel less dirty in our own viewing of the photo. > Sometimes when I take/took photos of that part of women, they have often > been tied up & suspended completely nude or almost so, but knew that I was > there, hired to make those photos. There was a sort of pact of personal > integrity and each other's morals th > at the model and I had between each other. In spite of the release form > and legal documents, if I were to make any of them uncomfortable for any > reason, I'm out of there. This street photography is not ironic or cheeky > or academic or making some statement other than a woman has a nice bottom. > That's just not the best way to pursue street photography if you were to > ask me. > I'm disappointed in what this esteemed community finds acceptable and > while I'll not quit the list, I'll not be complicit either. > Again, I'm not out to hurt anyone. Just to maybe open some eyes to what I > view as photographic hypocrisy and lack of respect. > Phil Forrest > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >