Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WAS: discreet shooter and shooting discretely NOW loupe & pixels????????????/
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:30:48 +0200
References: <7vpiof$4bb7dc@pd6mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca>

Dr. Ted, Ted

Thank you to write this question.

I think I haven't saw responses, but I'm not sure

BTW, the question is not stupid at all.

Saludos cordiales
Lluis


El 16/07/2009, a las 17:10, Ted Grant escribi?:

> Can I ask my usual stupid question, please? And thank you.
>
>
>
> Like what do you do with the loupe to look at pixels and where do  
> you do
> this? On Camera screen? Or computer screen? OR?
>
>
>
> And obviously what great amount of knowledge do I gain in doing  
> so?????
>
> Will it allow me to perform and see better as a photographer or as a  
> techie?
> No offence intended, as once again I'm a photographer first and  
> foremost and
> do enjoy taking pictures. But for the life of me I can not  
> understand what
> all this extra stuff of loupes and looking at pixels does other than  
> just
> taking up time from shooting better and more interesting photographs.
>
>
>
> Please enlighten me. Certainly if my photographic skills such as  
> seeing and
> shooting abilities will be improved beyond looking at a full  
> photograph
> determining whether I'm any good or not?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Ol doc ted!
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of  
> George
> Lottermoser
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:30 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] About discreet shooter and shooting discretely
>
>
>
> Welcome back Tina!
>
>
>
> Our wonderful world of photography
>
> remains so very interesting
>
> because of the wide variety of approaches.
>
> Wether:
>
> Film and/or sensors of all manner of square inches.
>
> Prints of silver, platinum, inks, pigments, dyes, cyan o and other  
> types
>
> Images of ferns, flesh, flies, fires, freedom, folks, flukes and all.
>
> I find great pleasure in looking at photographs
>
> with a loupe, pixel peeping and standing back.
>
>
>
> ;~)
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> George Lottermoser
>
> george at imagist.com
>
> http://www.imagist.com
>
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>
>
>> not convinced that photos should be examined with a loupe instead
>
>> of standing back to see what the photo is really about.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Leica Users Group.
>
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.16/2240 - Release Date:  
> 07/15/09
> 17:58:00
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Lluis Ripoll
luisripoll at telefonica.net

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
Blog:
http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/

http://www.lrmusic.es






In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] WAS: discreet shooter and shooting discretely NOW loupe & pixels????????????/)