Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8.2
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:34:45 -0700
References: <7A7F748B-D3E6-487E-B9A3-DF5F07B2F7B2@comcast.net> <9A920B52-9E50-4879-8B0F-28BB793B28AE@mac.com> <75822665-48E7-4300-820F-10E1712BB5B6@comcast.net>

Steve

 Didn't we learn in school that you cannot judge a workman by his tool?

Jerry


Steve Barbour wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:46 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> This one puzzles me.
>> How does the 8.2 improve the quality
>> of its images?
>> same sensor - same software - no?
>
>
> good question George, it must be in exactly the same way that a better 
> hammer builds a better house...
>
>
> ;
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>>> 4. the clear improvement in the quality of its images, especially 
>>> the RAW files
>>
>>



Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] M8.2)
Reply from stikwa at comcast.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M8.2)
In reply to: Message from stikwa at comcast.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M8.2)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M8.2)
Message from stikwa at comcast.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M8.2)