Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8.2
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:04:05 -0700
References: <7A7F748B-D3E6-487E-B9A3-DF5F07B2F7B2@comcast.net> <9A920B52-9E50-4879-8B0F-28BB793B28AE@mac.com>

Twice as expensive do twice as good automatically :-)




On 7/10/09, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
> This one puzzles me.
> How does the 8.2 improve the quality
> of its images?
> same sensor - same software - no?
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>
>> 4. the clear improvement in the quality of its images, especially
>> the RAW files
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.rfman.com blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963


In reply to: Message from stikwa at comcast.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M8.2)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M8.2)