Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You have to stay with it :). The only problem is that I have no idea if, on a print behind glass, that 3lp/mm vs. 6lp/mm means anything. I do know you can go too far. LF prints with unsharp masking in the darkroom burn my eyeballs out. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:52 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon Rumors > > Which is the non technical plain English? > R = 1 / (1/r1 + 1/r2) > or > Telecentricity coefficient C = A/B > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > From: Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:30:00 -0500 > > To: 'Leica Users Group' <lug at leica-users.org> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon Rumors > > > > I did run across an understandable article about the relationship of > sensor > > size to print quality (under the heading, "resolution, from the lens to > the > > paper"): > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/Leica-M8-Perspective.shtml > > > > It looks like the full-frame sensor may an advantage with large full- > frame > > prints, or with some moderate cropping. The main advantage seems to be > in > > lower noise, especially for higher contrast images. No revelations > there, > > but a non-technical explanation of the reasons. > > > > Ken > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information