Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Desert sand - sunny 16?
From: simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun)
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:32:55 +0200
References: <20090616200019.365F12BDCA9@barracuda.rutabaga.org> <p06230906c65e114fbb92@10.1.16.145>

Ahh Luxor,nice!Enjoy,simon

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw op 
archiphoto.com>wrote:

> Ok - hit a rough patch in Egypt today: at Saqqara hit subjects that were
>> low contrast and high brightness (hazy blue sky against sand and limestone
>> pyramids).
>>
>> Shooting Tri-X and a yellow cut filter, should I trust the meter (which is
>> reading for what looks a stop underexposed - 1/700 and f/16) and N+1 it to
>> enhance the highlight contrast - or believe that the sand is so bright?
>>  Under normal conditions with a clear blue sky and grey subjects, I have 
>> not
>> needed to apply a filter factor given my developing time (on the heavy 
>> side
>> of N development).
>>
>> But here, I don't have the film to bracket very much, and I am a little
>> worried about shouldering.  Best guess, Mr. Spock?  Hopefully Luxor will
>> have clearer skies...
>>
>> Dante
>>
>
>
> It's bright. Trust the meter, but consider that you want the sand fairly
> light. When we were there a couple of years ago, it was the same. You 
> should
> probably be shooting with the sunny 22 rule.
>
> Luxor will be better. And hotter :-).
>
> --
>
>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw op archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante A Stella) ([Leica] Desert sand - sunny 16?)