Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:56:59 +0800
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95D0@case-email.casefoods.com> <8D441F08-A3C2-4399-9072-23E0DDF3C858@cox.net> <p0623090ac64a26cf9ee9@10.0.1.199> <8BFF4EFE-F7E1-4804-B0F3-B25ED454FE3B@cox.net> <36172e5a0906012232n225ff0acg55dd249ae410ca0e@mail.gmail.com> <4A24C410.4030905@sfr.fr> <A197E35B-97C1-493A-A4D6-FDD78869CAB8@cox.net> <36172e5a0906020941r257709cch4f705c3956cc3951@mail.gmail.com> <D73E99D6-2BDF-4FFF-B586-C60D77E4B757@cox.net> <67EDF791-A8A8-452F-A699-8C7F2AB7A274@mac.com> <36172e5a0906021229h319002e6ueadee965b222ebcc@mail.gmail.com> <928113.5958.qm@web82101.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Nooooo! What about the newspaper tests? :P

On Jun 3, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Bob Adler wrote:

> Geoff,
> I'm I reading you right? Are you saying that the only reason for  
> Leica glass is for street reportage?
> Best,
> Bob
>  Bob Adler
> Palo Alto, CA
> http://www.raflexions.com
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 12:29:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?
>
> George, at 12x18 it is stunning in several forms. I may try the  
> limit of my
> 3800 soon. We shall talk when I'm home.
> I do also subscribe to the view that larger prints are meant to be
> viewedfrom further way and with the basics in place there is little  
> to limit
> the print size if that's appropriate for your end purpose.
> Steve's viewpoints are perfectly valid of course, but for me street
> reportage is by means the only reason for superb Leica glass
>
> 2009/6/3 George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
>
>> Traditionally - perhaps.
>>
>> If you saw Geoff's recent print shared in the print exchange
>> you may think differently about the M8 as a landscape tool.
>>
>> I'm not sure how large a print he could take it to.
>> But at 8x10 it looks like a contact print from an 8x10 negative.
>>
>> Stunning really.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>>
>> this is a terribly interesting discussion Geoff, and the points you
>>> mention, really get me thinking further about something I already  
>>> deeply
>>> believe,
>>>
>>> the quest for technical excellence above spontaneity and content  
>>> would
>>> certainly force me to consider large format, super large  
>>> negatives, or
>>> whatever  :-)  , as well as a tripod...
>>>
>>> striving for that level of pure technical excellence, would not  
>>> have me
>>> using a hand held camera with a cropped sensor, designed for  
>>> quick and
>>> discrete street shooting, capturing spontaneity...
>>>
>>> as I see it, these are  two quite different goals, the  
>>> accomplishment of
>>> each one being very difficult, and the where withall to do each,  
>>> at cross
>>> purposes...
>>>
>>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> 'Life's not B&W, except at both ends'
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein







In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Salgado in Sunday NY Times)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)