Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That has to be it. I use the ls-8000 to scan both 35mm and the 6x7. It must be the enlargement that makes the difference. On 5/31/09, Thein Onn Ming <mingthein at gmail.com> wrote: > You enlarge less for the same given print size, so the grain/dust > isn't magnified as much to the final print? > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Richard Man wrote: > >> OK, I developed 2 rolls of 120 and 2 rolls of 220 already. My >> development >> method is the same - XTol using a Jobo, sink water (too lazy to get >> distilled water) etc. but is it my imagination that the bigger negs >> are >> cleaner? I don't think it's just the magnification factor issue. I >> blow up >> the scan and the bigger negs just have less stuff on it?! Is my eyes >> deceiving me?! >> >> >> -- >> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com >> // w: http://www.rfman.com >> // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > THEIN Onn Ming > *photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com > www.flickr.com/mingthein > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com // w: http://www.rfman.com // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com